THE MAN BEHIND THE MASK

      In our last article, we learned that American Public Schools are not content with poisoning children's minds and souls; they are poisoning their bodies as well. As expected too, the silence in the Controlled Opposition 'Conservative' media has been noticeable as well. The American Right has its Third-Rail Topics too. With an election allegedly coming up next month and fantasies of a 'Red Wave' dancing in their heads, it's probably not considered politically expedient to call out American families for being the collection of deadbeats and failures that most of them actually are. It's much easier to blame Government when one is even a token opposition party. 

     A comment I left on a related article recently took a slightly different view of the situation. It was ignored and very likely shadowbanned.  

    "I stopped feeling sorry for American parents after they demanded---over Democrat objections no less---to send their kids straight back to public school hell-holes in 2020. How long have we known that there's sex-trafficking in the juvenile justice system? (since the 80s at least) How long have we known that so-called child welfare is hopelessly corrupt and unaccountable? Or that the public schools and universities were being radicalized? (Since at least the 90s on both). The Homo Agenda has been pushed on the young for the last two decades.

   "What have Conservatives done about it? Nothing. Nothing but look the other way and preaching to their kids to 'go-along-to-get-along' and 'go-with-the-flow'. Polls in 2022 show that these issues don't even crack the top ten with 'Conservative' voters."

   If that didn't sting badly enough, the next paragraphs really must have smarted:

  "Census figures also show that only about half of kids under 12 live with both biological parents and at least 1 in 4 women have had an abortion. Sure: I'll bet that all of those numbers are Liberal Democrats. Only 12 States have banned abortion since (after 50 years of inactivity) SCOTUS finally overturned Roe v. Wade.

  "Conservative apathy and hypocrisy are as responsible for situations like these as Democrat activism. Until we start facing the FACT that we're a failed society on top of being a failed democracy, nothing is going to change--in fact it will get worse, Red Wave or no Red Wave."

  Harsh? Maybe so, but it needs to be said. Frankly, I defy any Conservative to challenge any of what was said. 

   Prior to 2020, I was active in many educational reform programs. Some long-forgotten projects like School Vouchers and Charter Schools actually made ballots with varying success. There were other plans floated like mandatory performance audits of school budgets, capping useless academic bureaucracies, breaking up monopolies like teachers' unions, etc. More recently, I became impressed with some of the successful reforms in Russia such as extending their equivalent of AFDC to all women with children which encouraged stay-at-home mothering; and their expulsion of sinister foreign-owned NGOs from their schools and universities. 

   The school lockdowns of 2020---completely illegal as they were---was the ideal moment to demand change and expand parental rights and control over education. But it didn't happen. In fact, the opposite happened; and it was the so-called 'Conservatives' who led the opposition.

   It's like a retired doctor friend of mine said recently: "2020 was the year that the masks went on our faces, but the masks came off our souls."

  

   The Left opposed reopening---admittedly for all the wrong reasons. They maintained that because of the so-called 'pandemic' it wouldn't be safe to reopen schools: apparently the rampant violence, drugs, bullying, unsafe food, and gaslighting wasn't considered by the Left as especially dangerous before. But in spite of that, the Liberals finally agreed---with major conditions attached like mandatory masks, loyalty vaxxes, social distancing and whatever other sadistic humiliations that their lurid imaginations could devise to inflict on defenseless children. And 'Conservatives' wholeheartedly went for it.

   For a lot of us Conservatives, 2020 broke a lot of our illusions. Most of us knew that there was an active Deep State and vested interests working against our liberties. And it's not as though there weren't false flags and attempted coups within recent memory. Most of us believed that Trump's win and global events like BREXIT marked a turning-point. If the Deep State tried anything then: they'd meet with resistance and people were moving through the Constitutional System to reclaim their Rights. 

   This was part of the premise in supporting School Choice on my own part. A lot of us activists truly believed that American parents wanted it; and that it was really only a matter giving them the tools to do it, along with removing Government obstructionism and Corporate hijacking. But as many other issues that surfaced in 2020, we'd realized that we'd been lied to. 

   American parents like to live under the illusion that our society---and themselves in particular---care more about the welfare of children than any other society on earth. Nothing could be further than the truth. Our treatment of children and legal minors is a national disgrace and in fact, both at the familial and social levels we're nearly at the bottom of most developed countries. 

   It's hardly necessary to go over the statistics again. We can see with our own eyes the physical and psychological wreckage that both our homes and society has produced. Even our levels of infant morality and congenital birth-defects has skyrocketed during the last three decades. Look at the very numbers of persons under 18 suffering from chronic obesity, addicted to both prescription and illegal mind-altering drugs, rampant gender dysphoria and other neuroses, massive declines in literacy and knowledge of general facts---I simply can't believe seriously that parents didn't see any of this coming. We still don't know the long-term effects of the Loyalty Vaxx. And what's worse: the recent trend among 'Conservative' families has been to pretend that they didn't realize that it was going on at all. 

    

     When an American child is first conceived, the mother has decisions to make: whether it's 'wanted' or whether it should be disposed of and its tissue sold for hideous medical experiments. Then there's the issue of whether or not the father should be in the picture or not: he's obligated to pay for raising the kid, at least. 

    If an infant is lucky enough to get over the first hurdle and his parents hadn't done enough drugs to impair his health, he gets dumped in a daycare center while the sperm & egg donors carry on as before. At home he gets planted in front of a TV to have perverse children's shows drilled into his head. Then comes the degradation and regimentation of public school where he learns to question his instincts and to obey authority, They're given no spiritual or moral guidance other than Might Makes Right and the number of suicides and nervous breakdowns between the ages of 7-12 have been going up for several years: if he survives that, he learns that such things are only part of the weeding-out process. Merit has nothing to do with success: in fact it's a sign of some shadowy evil known vaguely as 'privilege.' 

  The teen years are likewise devoid of any moral or vocational guidance, and even though Nature is taking its course and they are actually young adults, parents and schools and media influence do their utmost to fight maturity and keep them at childhood levels of dependence. Teenagers whose nature rebels against any of this are either fed with dope until they conform or are turned over to the tender mercies of Child Protective agencies. Most who end up that route never recover from it and end up criminals, junkies, or suicides despite their previous potential as useful citizens. 

  A kid who makes it to this level learns that going along to get along is the wisest (and safest) course of action. A few who are intelligent and amoral enough to understand what it is being done to them get groomed for elite colleges or special training to become leaders in social order. The parents of either group are delighted that their offspring has showed its superiority to the common herd, although that 'magic age' of 18 presents a problem when the young one is booted out of the home to sink or swim on his own. The chosen group however is well taken care of, with a knowing wink and nod. 

  I wonder at this point if any Conservative family-values types are going to say that the above description doesn't fit at least half of the children and minors in his own neighborhood. 

  

   This is (one) reason why I don't believe there's going to be any 'Conservative Comeback' either this year or 2024. Conservatives political leaders can't hold a position on these---and many other---issues without indicting themselves. All that they can do is talk tough and grandstand and make proposals that usually more draconian than what the Left wants to do. I recently heard some GOP nitwit propose that parents who take their children to 'Pride Events' should be investigated by CPS. Great idea: just turn the Secret Police on a different target. Maybe better still: outsource CPS enforcement to thuggish mercenaries like Blackwater or Wackenhut---hey, that's the free market solution! 

   A real Conservative would ban public homo demonstrations and crack down on rogue agencies like CPS, but then they'd have to explain why these abuses have been ignored for so long. Simply re-orienting a corrupt system and changing the personnel would also mean that parents were still absolved from responsibility. Forcing parents to accept the homo agenda being pushed on their kids or jailing parents who teach their kids acceptance of it are equally acts of State oppression in an area where the State has no business being.  

   But to the majority of Americans---Left or Right---there's really little use trying to explain any of this. The minority who get it; the few who are really trying to raise families already are doing what needs to be done. Their best course of action is to network with other like-minded families because mutual support is badly needed now. 2020 showed a lot of us who the phonies really were; and we should beware of fake Conservatives lamenting the current crisis but who offer no alternative. 

  

   

  

MYSTERY MEAT AND PLASTIC BANANAS

   A project funded in part by the intrepid Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to assess the quality of the garbage fed American schoolchildren USDA School Lunch Program published its results this weekend. I think that most of us realize that foods served in public schools is substandard is no surprise (well, except to Conservative and Churchian parents who were doubtless as unaware of school lunch quality as they claim to have been about CRT, and Drag Queen Story Hours). 

  The project's actual findings however were probably worse than most of us suspected. 

    "Of the 43 school items tested, 95.3%, had detectable levels of glyphosate weed killer, the most widely used herbicide in the world, a known carcinogen."

   "100% of the wheat products were positive with glyphosate, averaging 42.09 ng/g."

   "29 different types of pesticides were present in 74% of the school lunches." 

    "Thiabendazole, an immune suppressant, was found in 27.9% of the samples." 

    "Piperonal Butoxide, a developmental toxin that causes birth defects and neurodevelopment disruptions, was in 41% of the samples." 

   "4 veterinary drugs and hormones were found in 9 school lunch samples at levels up to 130.76 ng/g."

   "100% of the school lunch samples contained heavy metals at levels up to 6,293 X higher than the EPA’s maximum levels allowed in drinking water."

   "The majority of the samples was abysmally low in nutrients."

   One is tempted to say that is inexcusable, but that phrase has become more or less the definition of American Public Schools in general. Our schools are rat's-nests of corruption, abject failures in their alleged purposes of educating anybody; bullying, violence, and child-abuse are routinely perpetrated by students and school employees alike, drugs are dished out like candy; perverted social workers and thuggish administrators and faculty rule with an iron fist---in short, they are more like prisons than anything else---and apparently the food is just as bad. That shouldn't be surprising since the Corporate monopolies who provide school lunches also cater to the Prison-Industrial Complex. 

     American parents of today, of course, could care less about any of this. However, this wasn't always the case. When President Truman signed the National School Lunch Act into law in 1946, Corporate profiteers and shady NGOs were actually prohibited from pushing their tentacles into the program. Food was purchased by brokers from the US Department of Agriculture. The restrictions were loosened somewhat in the 1970s and 1980s, but even by the end of the Reagan Administration, only 4% of school districts outsourced to private contractors. 

    Then came the 'deregulation' craze of the 1990s. Clinton/Gore Neoliberalism pushed the 'Private-Public Partnership' philosophy to the hilt---fully aided and abetted by RINOs in control of Congress. Alongside of that came Hillary Clinton's It Takes a Village philosophy of abdicating parental responsibilities---fully aided and abetted by American parents. Since that time, American parents have looked upon the public schools as a subsidized babysitting service. The only debate has been whether or not schools would be run under the privatized Socialist model or the State Socialist model. The recent fusion of 'woke' Corporatism and the Bureaucratic State has resolved that debate for all intents and purposes. 

   Regulatory Capture of the USDA was observed as early as 1997 and since then the School Lunch Program has been wholly under the thumb of Big Agricultural interests. People, for example, like those running the Gates Foundation which is swallowing up American farmland and promoting global depopulation are major donors to USDA programs. Tom Vilsack, the Junta's current Minister of Agriculture, served under Obama and worked as a Big Ag lobbyist during the Trump years. In fact, Vilsack's top political donors are notoriously short of farmers, but dominated by PACs, lobbyists, and real-estate moguls like Warren Buffett, a WEF linchpin and co-chair of the aforementioned Gates Foundation.

   During Obama's term, Vilsack famously championed the use of beef by-products in public schools. Organic Insider notes that Vilsack's other noteworthy policies were:

     Vilsack's nomination by the Junta, incidentally, was supported by 44 Republican Senators.
       

    Today, American school lunch programs are dominated by three supranational Corporate cartels: the Compass Group, Aramark, and Sodexo---two of which are foreign-owned, and all three of which have very dubious reputations. In fact, their catalog of crimes is so blatant that even Wikipedia called them out here, here, and here. The Compass CEO responsible for most of the company's illegal activities died under suspicious circumstances in 2017, but even that hasn't affected their status as an industry leader. Aramark's CEO John Zillmer is on the Board of Directors of the Gates Foundation-funded Ecolab, which in turn is also a major Government contractor.

  All three of these contractors are also heavily tied to US Agribusiness interests, specifically Kraft Foods and Tyson Foods, the latter of which has managed to rack up an ever greater track-record of Corporate malfeasance than the three previously mentioned combined. Tyson is a member of the World Economic Forum, and closely connected politically with the Clinton Family. (One of Tyson's top lobbyists in DC is former Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas). The Junta's Ambassador to the WEF, John Kerry, and WEF Oligarch Warren Buffett are major stakeholders in Kraft Foods. Republican Senators John Hoeven and Roy Blunt own about a quarter-million dollars in Kraft stock. 

   According to the USDA's own numbers, the food served in 87% of public, non-charter schools in 2014-15 offered branded foods for à la carte purchase during meal times, and vending machines were available in 30% of all schools (including 71% of high schools). It's hardly any accident that childhood obesity rates have skyrocketed since the phony 'deregulation' of the 90s as fast as toxicity levels in school lunches have. 

   As might be expected, the quality of food purchased by contractors is not an especially high priority. In fact, their general practice is to purchase unsalable processed foods which barely meet standards for consumption at pennies on the dollar, and then palm them off on public schools for a fat government subsidy. They will never be held to account for these practices either. Besides their control of the USDA, the 'Big Three' have a sizable battery of Beltway lobbyists---the overwhelming majority of whom are revolving-door former federal officials. 

  Ultimately, though, the responsibility falls upon American parents who have looked the other way and allowed this situation to happen. They can plead ignorance all they want to, but increasing obesity rates and sicknesses---not to mention that their kids probably complained about the food more than once---hardly could have escaped their notice. If they'd paid as much attention to their children's diets as they have checking their stock-returns and the newest strains of recreational drugs, maybe this wouldn't have happened. I feel sad for the children and teens caught in these public-school hells, but for their parents, I feel no sympathy whatsoever. 

   Our public schools are a disaster, and it is another disaster of the American people's own making. It's become impossible anymore to listen to pundits on the Right spouting off about parenting as though their own hypocrisy and duplicity had nothing to do with our failed schools and broken homes. One recalls, during the Scamdemic, it was the Conservatives---not the Liberal Left---who were demanding the loudest to reopen these failed institutions. Recall also at that time, schools were demanding mandatory masking and Loyalty Vaxxes.

  In fact, 2022 election polls show that family and education are not even on Conservative voters' list of priorities. As for the Democrats, the 'right' to kill unborn babies is their top concern. Saving the same lives is a distant third priority among the so-called Right: behind making more money and scapegoating immigrants. Tell us all again that we're the Party of Principle standing for faith, family, and freedom. Even if we could imagine a fair election at this point I don't believe that the Right deserves to win. Those who disregard the welfare of their own families can't be trusted with the welfare of a nation. 

   

   

   

RUSSIA SPIKES BELTWAY POWER-PLAY

   In case one only listens to the Corporate-controlled media and their controlled opposition in the so-called 'Conservative' press, it's been nothing but 24/7 Russia-bashing with our 'Baghdad Bobs' assuring us that Russia is losing the war! With a small Expeditionary Force, Russia has wiped out most of Ukraine's military infrastructure. The squalid Zelensky Regime is only propped up by foreign hardware and mercenaries---money which could have been spent on American infrastructure---but NPCs still want to pretend that our own nation has no problems needing to be addressed. 

  This week, referenda were held across the liberated sectors of Ukraine and in the newly-independent Donbass Republics, which overwhelmingly voted to join Russia as new states. The leadership of the exceptional US went green with envy and in a jealous rage tried unsuccessfully to ram through a UN condemnation of the annexation. After all, the US hasn't admitted a new state in nearly 65 years---in fact we've lost territory since the 1970s. Russia, meanwhile, has admitted seven new states since the 1990s with others eager to join. 

   The annexation means now that these new states are part of Russia, and explains the real reason why President Putin recently activated reserve forces. An attack on these areas now constitutes an attack on Russia. Zelensky desperately begged for immediate inclusion into NATO, but the Biden-Harris Junta slinked away, knowing that Putin has check-mated their territorial ambitions and that, whatever their criminal interests in Ukraine are, World War III is not on the table. It was a brilliant move by Russia; reminiscent of China's closing of the South China Sea which backed down Obama in 2016. 

   In their frustration, the Oligarchs and their media parrots actually accused Russia of stealing the elections: if that isn't some of the worst psychological projection and hypocrisy I don't know what is.

   The so-called 'military experts' who've been predicting Russian defeat since February have no real understanding of military strategy. Pentagon Pride Month, Critical Race Theory, and getting inside deals for the Military-Industrial Complex: that they understand. Their idea of strategy is simply bombing some nation with a military smaller than most of our National Guard units into submission---blasting everything to pieces and gunning down anything that moves---finishing up with thuggish contractors who plunder the resources, enslave the populations to supranational cartels as 'war debt,' and get the Ameroboobs to cheer it all on like a bunch of frat boys at a college homecoming game. 

  In modern military strategy, if one actually intends to liberate a people (like Russia actually does and we pretend to do), one tries to avoid destroying infrastructure and mounting civilian casualties. This why Russian progress has been 'slow' (but effective). We saw this happen in Iraq when the Iraqi Government refused Obama's 'help' in fighting ISIS. Iraqi cities were liberated were reopened in short order with no Beltway strings attached. The same thing happened in Syria: Aleppo was liberated in the summer and by Christmas the city was celebrating the holidays again.

  The actual purpose of the 'Ukraine Crisis' from the Western Regime's standpoint was to isolate Russia, and force the EU countries to buy US and Canadian products at inflated prices. The Deep State's sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline was intended to do exactly that. The second reason is that the so-called 'Russia Threat' provided an excuse to station more US and Canadian troops in Europe to help their puppet-governments control the population---which has been protesting Great Reset policies. And the third reason is to cause price inflation, poverty, and unemployment throughout Europe to punish the populations for said protests. 

    In America, the 'Russian Threat' also provides a useful distraction to an unthinking population, The Left hates Russia for not being 'woke'; the fake Right uses Russia as a foil to complain about 'weakness' in Foreign Policy; and the Corporate Overlords who control both parties hate Russia because Russia won't submit to them. And the Ameroboobs forget about our failed democracy, our contracting economy, rampant crime and drug problems, etc.

  What exactly is this 'Russian Threat?' We're threatened by a country where the Government encourages raising families and going to church. A country that actually enforces laws, keeps the Gay Mafia, religious cults, and organized crime off the streets. A government that doesn't continually lie to the people and is actually respected by a majority of the citizens. A government that enforces drug laws and helps addicts get treatment. A country without corporate looters sucking the life blood out of essential industries. A country with schools that actually educate people and medical facilities that actually cure the sick. A country with a functioning infrastructure, where dams and bridges don't routinely collapse and transportation is actually reliable.

  That is what we're afraid of? In a way, yes. Americans hate Russia because Russia's very existence is a constant reminder of our own failure to uphold the values of Western Civilization. Russia's strength and popularity is a reflection of our weakness and the contemptible sham of 'American Exceptionalism.' Putin understands this better than most Americans do; and has stated that Russia will "follow its own path", rather some 'New World Order' dreamed up international oligarchs. 

   The major turning-point for the NWO scum is now going to have to focus on Europe. Russia's successes and the Great Reset crowd's failures are becoming too obvious and apparent to ignore in Europe. To these NWO types, countries and populations are expendable and much will depend upon how well they can keep Europe under their thumb. My own opinion all along is that they intend to throw the EU and NATO under the bus and reorganize the Anglosphere nations as their foundation for their New Order. Cost-Benefit Analysis are the only terms in which the Fourth Industrial Revolution is premised: Europe is resource-poor and densely populated, hence the Oligarchy likely see the continent as a net loss. 

   Russia, however, offers hope of a revitalized Europe. Russia currently is the only superpower standing tall for Western values of freedom and civilization. European peoples are beginning to awaken to this fact, and like the new Russian states are joining hands with Moscow in the defense of Liberty against neoliberal and neocon Tyranny.

THE GREAT ROYAL RESET

      Now that the matriarch of Britain's Windsor-Mountbatten crime family has finally been planted in the ground, the media jackals are busily ferreting out their next public distraction. So busy were they in fact, they missed a few stories of King Chuck getting acquainted with his royal subjects.

   His Highness is apparently making it very clear that the neo-Feudalism espoused by himself and his friends at the World Economic Forum isn't simply political rhetoric.

    Well, I suppose that a man who's capable of murdering his wife is capable of about anything. It is rather an interesting coincidence too that the Queen Mum chose to expire just as a documentary on Lady Diana Spencer was about to be released on the 25th Anniversary of her death. (For those Millennials and Zoomers reading, Diana was killed in a highly suspicious car crash in 1997). Polls in the UK show that between 1/3 and 2/5 of Britons have serious doubts about the Official Narrative. The last investigative documentary on Diana's death was filmed in 2011 and funded by the family of Dodi Fayed, was also killed in the crash. No major network in the UK or US ever broadcast it. At least there's plenty of tradition there for Neocons to admire too: Henry VIII was the most notorious (known) British monarch for killing wives and suppressing dissent. Charles has a way to go to match Henry's record on wives, but is well on the way to surpassing him in handling critics of the Crown. His ancestor, George III also set a fairly high bar in that regard. 

   While on the subject of the Great Reset, the accession of King Charles to the throne now makes three of the top five English-speaking nations headed by WEF members (UK, Canada, and New Zealand). The other two, Australia and America, are not exactly sparsely populated with disciples of Klaus Schwab in powerful positions. That's not even counting members who are presidents of France, Poland, and the Netherlands; or the Royal families of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, and Bahrain. 

 “We've so degraded natural systems, eco-systems, biodiversity, that it's becoming increasingly impossible for nature to sustain us...At the moment it's all take, take. Now we've reached the situation where we really need four planets like earth to survive or provide enough for everybody....So what do we do?" Charles asked at the 2020 WEF Conference. Anybody want to guess his answer?

 "Without doubt we must now put ourselves on a war-like footing, approaching our action from the perspective of a military-style campaign. That way, working together we can combat this most grave and urgent challenge. If we have the resolve to shift our trajectory we must start now, by bringing forward our net zero target.” And we'll let the reader use his imagination as to what he hopes to zero out. Keep in mind that Charles' father Prince Phillip once complained to the Corporate Media that a successful anti-malaria program in Ceylon had been responsible for a population increase on that island. In fact, Philip and his ex-Nazi cohort Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands founded the World Wildlife Fund, which has become largely a front for WEF-connected NGOs to carry out their evil schemes upon defenseless third-world populations. 

  Charles himself heads a fake philanthropy called The Princes Charities which has 18 subdivisions operating in the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the US. One of the main contributors is billionaire cult leader Aga Khan, who is also deeply connected to the Trudeau Family and considered a "spiritual mentor" by Tiananmen Trudeau himself. Aga Khan is an honorary Canadian citizen, holds the honorary Key to the City of Ottawa, and the title of Honorary Companion of the Order of Canada. He also holds ten honorary doctoral degrees from Canadian Universities. His cult of 20 million Ismaili Muslims donate money to him as their leader, or 'bringer of light'. As leader, he is considered infallible and immune from sin. As one might expect, Charles' network is a labyrinth of corporate crooks, deep-state operatives, and Great Reset fanatics. 

    The British people learned that BREXIT was not enough; there are other foreign political and economic overlords hovering over London as well. It's time for BREXIT II: abolish the monarchy and the oligarchy along with it. Support for those things are growing: let's give them all of the support that we can. 

   

  

   

 

   

 

A SPECTRE IS STALKING THE POSTMODERN RIGHT

   There has been a genuinely disturbing trend across the Conservative punditocracy, blogs, and vlogs cropping up recently. True, there's been a (deserved) backlash against appeasing, flexible RINOs. However, this reaction is taking a decidedly dark turn. We are not seeing a return to foundational Conservative principles based upon the Rights of Man, endowed by his Creator; nor is a Reaganite/Buckley resurgence of faith, family, and freedom. In fact, it's not even in the Make America Great Again action-plans of Trumpism.

   Rather, what we seem to be witnessing is an unholy fusion of amoral 2000s Neoconservatism and 2010s Alt-Right/Red Pill relativism. Might Makes Right replaces the Rule of Law; Controlling the Narrative is fast replacing the pursuit of Truth; the pursuit of wealth and power supplanting any religious ideals. Like the Red Pills before it, there is a distinct absence in this new strain of so-called Conservatism a marked absence of joy, hope, tolerance, or mercy. This new road is not one that we want to go down. 

   The tendency that we're describing was manifested clearly this week. A so-called 'Conservative' governor made headlines by lying to fifty Venezuelan refugees, packing them on a jet, and dumping them on street in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. This repugnant display not only met with applause from the Right, it was met with peals of laughter as well. With appalling cynicism, Governor DeSantis claimed that the refugees would be "better taken care of in wealthy neighborhoods where they were wanted"---as if there were no private agencies in Florida willing to do it---and Victor Davis Hanson joined the chorus of sneers, calling it "a teachable moment for the pro-immigrant Liberals." The New Alt-Right has been making hay out of the residents of Martha's Vineyard moving the refugees away---they've been chortling that "these compassionate Liberals can't even handle 50 refugees!" Their critics, though, certainly must be aware that Martha's Vineyard is a town of 15,000 and even the Dukes County Jail has a maximum capacity of only 40 people. 

   Aside from the obvious immorality and inhumanity of using vulnerable human beings as props in a political publicity stunt, it's highly questionable whether what DeSantis and these other RINO governors are doing is even legal. For one thing, States have no constitutional authority over immigration; and the law makes it very clear that immigrants are to be processed at their Point of Entry. Shipping undocumented immigrants to a so-called 'sanctuary' without permission from ICE comes very close to Obstruction of Justice; and the fact that it is interstate puts it fairly close to Human Trafficking. There is also this minor detail about being deprived of Due Process. So much for the GOP being the Law and Order Party.

   The condescending contempt for civilized behavior bears the unmistakable imprint of Red Pill influence on this new breed of Conservative. There is the same basic policy of co-opting the practices and attitudes of the Left, "beating them at their own game" as opposed to offering sane solutions. In the passive-aggressive mentality of the postmodern American Right, beating them at their own game is the aggressive pole of the passive go along to get along. Both are essentially symptoms of sociopolitical weakness---not strength---because they are premised on the belief that the means of the Left have succeeded while the principles Conservatives are supposed to uphold are failures; or hold no value in the real world. 

             

     Ron DeSantis has become the archetype of this new, tough and realistic Conservative. DeSantis first gained national notoriety as one of the most thuggish lockdown tyrants who actively participated in and promoted the fraud. He suddenly reversed course on the advice of his mentor Jeb Bush, who saw in DeSantis a potential alternative to Trump, whose populist appeal the Bush Machine openly despises. 

    With considerable promotion from the Controlled Opposition Conservative Media Establishment, DeSantis rebranded himself as some bastion of resistance to the Biden/Harris Junta, working on behalf of the American people. Nothing could be further from the truth. DeSantis has shown every indication that he is nothing but an Establishment Republican with little or no regard for actual populist Conservatism. In fact, despite his recent flap over Martha's Vineyard, DeSantis' (official) donor list shows him fairly closely tied to Chicago politics and interests. His top individual contributor, Bob Bigelow, was also Rahm Emmanuel's top private donor.

    The Martha's Vineyard fiasco wasn't DeSantis' first foray into sacrificing Conservative principles (and using people as pawns to do it) to own those Libtards and grab the headlines. Here's a sampling of DeSantis' 'victories' over the Left so far:

Voter Fraud: Although Florida had no noticeable issues with this in 2020, DeSantis created a new State bureaucracy called the Office of Election Crimes and Security. It's basically a secret police force, though it isn't composed of sworn officers of the law. The new force will have the power to launch independent investigations into mere allegations of election law violations or election irregularities. 

Gerrymandering: DeSantis' redistricting plan was so extreme that it met opposition from a GOP-controlled Legislature and was finally declared unconstitutional by the Florida Supreme Court last May which even a DeSantis-appointed judge remarked would "ultimately revoke a 2010 amendment to the Florida constitution, overwhelmingly approved by voters, that sets guardrails on the redistricting process and constitutionally bans gerrymandering on the basis of race."

Intimidating Opponents: Rebekah Jones, who made claims that DeSantis' Administration lied about Scamdemic deaths, had her home raided, property seized and was roughed up by police thugs acting on DeSantis' orders. 

Cancel Culture: DeSantis makes a (largely ineffectual) show of fighting Cancel Culture by engaging in it himself. In April, he issued a proclamation expanding Florida lawmakers' special session to abolish all independent special districts created before November 1968. This includes the Disney-owned Reedy Creek, NASCAR's independent district in North Florida, and every Native American independent district. That is 133 independent special districts that are about to lose their autonomy completely. The property taxes these entities paid will now be shifted to county residents---a small detail that DeSantis supporters seem to overlook. It hasn't, incidentally, eliminated 'wokeness' in either Disney or NASCAR. 

 Political Correctness: DeSantis' idea of fighting Political Correctness in public education is not by expanding School Choice or having Performance Audits on these institutions. Rather, he's replacing Left-Wing PC with a Right-Wing version; limiting tenure, outsourcing accreditation and promoting political purity tests for faculty. 

Parental Rights: DeSantis is not in favor of expanding parental rights despite his rhetoric. He has suggested that child protective statutes could be used against parents who allow their children to attend homo 'pride' events in Florida. Denouncing parents to CPS for bringing children or minors to legally public events is not exactly a Conservative position. It's noteworthy doesn't prohibit such public events (that would cut into Bruce Jenner's speaking fees). He also signed on to the phony '15-week abortion ban' to keep the foetal tissue supply flowing instead of banning the procedure outright. 

    It's very clear that this new trend on the Right has nothing to with Conservative principles, but is instead simply based on 'getting even' with the Left, back-room economic deals, and political expediency and chicanery. What's most dangerous about it is not only that it's imported the tactics of the Left; the proponents of this trend have also adopted their attitudes. We are supposed to be better than the Left: that means having better ideas, a sounder basis in absolute and established principles, policies that work for everyone, and respect for the value of human life. We're not supposed to be better Authoritarians, better at being 'woke', better at being Politically Correct, better at Cancel Culture, etc. If this is the alternative, we may as well support the Democrats on the simple grounds that an inefficient dictatorship is at least more tolerable than an efficient one. (Ask yourself: if you had to make the choice, would you prefer to live in an EU country or Canada, you'll see that the difference is wider than one might suppose). We don't need a Right-Wing version of Justin Trudeau in the United States, that is for certain. 

   

  

  

GODLESS CAPITALISM IS NO SOLUTION, PART III

      With Elections supposedly coming up in November, the Controlled Opposition Republican Party is trying desperately to prove itself somehow distinct from the Ruling Junta Democratic Party. To the Corporations who actually rule the United States, this is all just a social experiment; changing parties to them is not much different than changing management. It's really to Wall Street and not to the people that both parties are marketing their message proposing a platform; the GOP is apparently to position themselves as more overtly ruthless and willing to execute the New World Order than the Democrats are. Those of us who remember the 2000 Elections probably all see that it's the same script being played. Hopefully, we all remember how well that worked out. 

    Neoconservatism has never been friendly to Christian or traditionally Conservative values, though for obvious reasons Neocons have to pander to the so-called 'Religious Right' and have largely redefined what 'Christian Values' mean. The movement began in the 1960s, by former Marxist academics and pundits---mostly Jews and Atheists---who split with the Left largely because of Neocon opposition to Lyndon Johnson's Great Society and Civil Rights programs; as well as their belief that LBJ was too soft on Vietnam. If this sounds paradoxical, it must be remembered that the bulk of them came from the Trotskyite branch of Communism, which by the 1960s had the belief that Stalin and Khrushchev destroyed the 'golden ideal' of Communism and that the USSR was hopelessly corrupt. 

   Against that background, one can see the real context behind the famous quote of Irving Kristol, one of the ringleaders of the Neocon movement: "A neoconservative is a Liberal who has been mugged by reality." It also accounts for the Neocons' fanatical hatred of all things Russian. 

   Another of Kristol's insights into practical politics illustrates the Neocon's true feelings towards representative self-government:

   "There are different kinds of truths for different kinds of people. There are truths appropriate for children; truths that are appropriate for students; truths that are appropriate for educated adults; and truths that are appropriate for highly educated adults, and the notion that there should be one set of truths available to everyone is a modern democratic fallacy. It doesn't work."

    We'll let the reader decide for himself how compatible with Christ's teachings that statement really is.* (See note at the end of this article.) The idea, however, is not incompatible with the goals and aims of the dandies at the World Economic Forum. An anonymous writer stated the following which points out how phony the Neocon opposition to Left-Wing 'wokeness' really is:

  "The idea of forcibly spreading democracy and free markets throughout the world is parallel to the Communist idea of a world revolution.The political philosopher Francis Fukuyama stated that his book, 'The End of History' which was written from a neoconservative perspective, set forth an essentially Marxist vision of social evolution with liberal democracy replacing 'pure communism' as the final state of society. He furthered this parallel by stating that the Bush administration's sort of neoconservatism was a form of Leninism, i.e., a sort in which an elite vanguard tries to push the revolution forward when the proles won't.

  "The much more low-brow neoconservative pundit Dennis Prager also authored a book similar to Fukuyama's called 'Still the Best Hope', which set forth a vision of the world in which people worldwide would embrace 'American values' after the liberal media, universities, and politicians could no longer dupe the public into voting left-wing. After this, the world would largely embrace American ultraconservatism, which would result in the fall of Leftism and Islamic Fundamentalism leaving neoconservatism as the most widely embraced ideology in the world for the foreseeable future."

   As pointed out in the previous two articles, the free market that the Neocons embrace is really the crony-capitalism of the WEF and similar organizations. Their Elitism, egoism, revolutionary zeal, and contempt for the untermensch largely explains their complete unwillingness to raise the standard of living in the US, while having no qualms about imposing their exceptionalism on other countries whether those countries want it or not. 

   To sell their baloney to the constituency, the Neocons have to do a lot of revisionism to Christian principles to hoodwink Churchians into believing that money and power are Fruits of the Holy Spirit. 

  "Whether we like it or not, we humans have become this planet's stewards. Our long-term success is not remotely assured but ignoring reality and building fatally flawed systems upon which hundreds of millions rely is certain to lead to our's and possibly our planet's demise. Yet the solution is right before our eyes and is happening every day. There is a symmetry and self-balancing nature driven by modernity. Modernity brings freedom and Rule of Law. Modernity brings the scientific process and widespread knowledge of all aspects of reality. Together these provide the framework for wealth creation. This wealth creation further drives innovation in all areas of life. It creates a virtuous circle where one good thing leads to another and so on.

   "One feature of this symmetry is the reduction of the number of people required to generate the same or even more economic output. Almost all predict in just the next few years we will see an explosion of these innovations even further reducing the number of people required to do the same things---hitting low-skilled jobs the hardest. This is in perfect harmony with another feature of modernity: birth rates dropping and populations stabilizing. All of these pieces support the others and they all move more or less in harmony. It is clear that the worldwide answer to the Population Explosion is freedom and modernity and anything which distorts this harmony by definition will be destructive."

    This drivel wasn't written by Bill Gates or His Royal Highness King Chuck of England, but it may as well have been. No: it came from the pen of John Conlin, one of the 'rising stars' of the Neocon punditocracy. Conlin runs a nonprofit consulting firm and it's foundational principles state "a search for truth...the truth we will leave to God."  His financial expertise seems to be a fairly sophisticated form of day-trading. Regardless, he seems to be promoting the idea that population control is somehow now a 'Conservative' value. 

    First of all, the idea of population control is based on the pseudoscience that Earth's resources are limited relative to population increases. That's true if all of the wealth and resources are being hoarded by Oligarchs, but in reality its falsehood is evident by one of Conlin's own assertions: "Modernity brings the scientific process and widespread knowledge of all aspects of reality. Together these provide the framework for wealth creation. This wealth creation further drives innovation in all areas of life. It creates a virtuous circle where one good thing leads to another and so on." In other words---in a genuine free market---science and knowledge expand their technologies to meet growing demand for more resources. His conclusion that this should lead to population decline is specious---in fact, it should logically lead to larger families. Absent abortion-on-demand and political propaganda, it usually does. Note that in Victorian times, the birthrate among the expanding Middle Class went up, it also did in America during the settlement of the West, and today the birth rate is coming back in Russia as economic conditions have begun to improve. 

    At any rate, the idea of population control is not a spiritual doctrine in any major Western religion that I know of. The Jews teach "Be fruitful and multiply" as one of the first commandments given by God to mankind; the Catholic Church has never sanctioned birth control in any form; the Moslems believe that children are gifts from God (actually Western Christians used to believe that too, but today it's Islam that practices what it preaches). 

    Frankly, the only difference I can discern between Conlin's proposals and Klaus Schwab's is that Conlin seems to target population control to 'undesirable' (i.e. non-White American) demographics whereas Schwab wants it for the hoi polloi in general. Throughout Conlin's entire thesis there is not a single reference to the ethics of his proposals: his entire argument is based on economic expediency and market calculations (none of which are actually beneficial to the working class or to small businesses, but are hugely beneficial to monopolistic corporations). 

   Conlin also makes other questionable assertions in addition to his flawed premises. "Rather than importing people, perhaps we should be spreading the message of freedom and modernity and all of the wonders it brings to all parts of the globe. {Query: How?} Individuals in these countries may choose to ignore these wonders; that is their choice.{Our recent interventionist history strongly suggests otherwise.}  But exporting their “surplus” population to the United States is not a solution for either country." This last statement is demonstrably false. In Mexico, for example, it's easier to start a small business than it is most of the US. The problem that most Mexicans face is that it is extremely difficult to raise capital. Many come to the US and work at minimum wage (the Mexican minimum wage is 50 cents an hour) and raise the money needed to begin a new life---not here, but in Mexico. The Mexicans benefit and so do we, as our small businesses often need temporary minimum-wage workers.

    But missing from all of this is any concept of humanity as Children of God. The Neocon view shares with the WEF the view of humanity as human capital,**(See second note at the end of article). It's a small move intellectually from that viewpoint the sort which sees political opponents as enemy combatants who ought to be dealt with accordingly.

   If there is any truth to either Christian or Conservative principles, then there is no justification for resorting to force and fraud to maintain them. Mimicking the Left's tactics is a confession that their methodology works and ours does not. If we have faith in our principles, then we don't need more than stand firm in them and let the Truth speak for itself. 

****************************************************************************

(Note 1) I can't vouch for the veracity of this anecdote, given its source. It came from David Brock, a former RNC operative who switched sides after Hillary Clinton and George Soros offered him more money and a live-in boyfriend to work for them instead. I tend to believe it's true, however, given Brock's intimacy with the people involved and their known characters.

     According to Brock, one of Bush's top cronies and arch-Neocon Karl Rove is actually an Atheist, though Rove went around campaigning at churches and Christian activist groups. Brock said that Rove afterwards would laugh up his sleeve at how stupid he thought Christians were and their gullibility for falling for any of Bush's talking-points which the latter had no intention of honoring. 

(Note 2) A specimen of this attitude in practice is the UK-based Serco Corporation, which has in offices signs stating "Just remember, you're not a worker or an employee. You're human capital." Shortly before the Scamdemic, Bill Gates bought a huge chunk of Serco stock and then lobbied to have them manufacture Vaxx-tracing equipment. Serco is a major government contractor supplying the Security and Surveillance State. It's CEO is Christopher Hyman, a member of a Fundamentalist Christian Church who goes about giving testimonial speeches claiming the secret of his success is because he "listens to God." 

   

  
  

   

    

GODLESS CAPITALISM IS NO SOLUTION, PART II

      So, shortly after the last article went to print, another specimen of alleged profound Conservative thought, also reached the public. This time, Dennis Prager weighed in to explain to us all how being nice is not a Conservative value. His argument is flawed right from the start:

    "The human being is composed of two moral components—the micro and the macro. In a truly good human being—”good” is not the same as “nice”—one is good in both realms. It is therefore quite possible to be nice in the micro and hold awful values for society; and it is quite possible to have excellent macro values and not be a particularly nice person." No, Dennis. What you say is not true. There is no dichotomy between 'micro' and 'macro' approaches to society; there is only the element of Virtue or lack of it. Good people want to do good things; bad people do not; and their motives are reflective of the criterion upon which their actions are judged good or bad. 

   Prager's position is essentially a morally relativist one, though he would never admit that. Belief in this ideology is one reason why we see so much hypocrisy on the political Right these days. Bruce Jenner has excellent macro values but is not  a particularly nice person; but nonetheless is welcomed while identical characters on the Left are denounced. We could probably find dozens of similar examples. His way of thinking is only the opposite extreme of the Left's the personal is political. Both are wrong: in reality, the political is personal. 

  Ideas, however, do have consequences. If one has seen some recent headlines among the Controlled Opposition Conservative Media, A pair of politically ambitious Republican Governors are proving their ability not to be nice on the macro level by making a big show of putting illegal immigrants on various forms of transportation and shipping them to 'sanctuary cities.' These actions have garnered effusive praise from many on the knee-jerk Right, but even from the standpoint of pure Realpolitik, it's a stupid idea. If illegals should all be deported---like these jokers claim to want---how is sending them to Sanctuary Cities where they won't be deported supposed to accomplish that? 

   It also seems rather ironic that just a few months ago many of us were concerned about rhetoric from the Left's punditocracy suggesting that everyone refusing the Loyalty Vaxx should be packed on buses and dumped somewhere. If it's wrong for one side to do it; it's wrong for the other. It's ironic too that this latest batch that Abbott shipped to Kamala Harris' house are from Venezuela---a country supposedly ruled by a Socialist dictatorship---and nobody on the Right seems to understand that they might be fleeing Socialism and be by definition supportive of Conservative causes themselves.  

  But these are the consequences of the doctrine that personal and social beliefs are categorically distinct. It's really disgraceful that we even have to explain that rounding up human beings like cattle, stuffing them onto boxcars and dumping them in random cities like garbage is not an especially Christian thing to be doing. Reading many of the comments on these stories, though; one immediately sees that the humanitarian aspect of this policy is not exactly an outstanding concern of many on the so-called Right. 

  "Migrants arrived at Kamala's taxpayer provided residence in Washington D.C. and were greeted warmly as human beings just looking for a better life - no explanation was given as to why America must provide that better life." 

  "They are like a hybrid of locusts and cockroaches. They circumvent the laws and avoid taxes, so each year the tax payer pays more, with less improvement to the infrastructure, and more and more of non illegals jumped on that democrap free wagon to join them if you can't beat them. Everyone else moved. It's a nightmare going back there to see what the country has turned into, as the past never happened. It's surreal, and shocking."

"The Left is trying to genocide whitey through immigration."

  "These just aren't dirty illegals coming to get the free and take, they are out to destroy."

  "DeSantis realizes illegal immigrants bring nothing of value to our country. As a former military man, he knows what it takes to get results, who is valued most and how a good strong work ethic Makes America Great Again. He has a natural innate disdain for parasites."

   Bear in mind that these are the sentiments---not of Godless Communists, but from those of a political movement purporting to stand for faith, family, and freedom. The entire notion that these people---like ourselves---are Children of God and worthy of humanitarian dignity is not even mentioned. 

  There are a few points that supporters of these thoughts and policies seem to leave out: 1) A large number of these illegals are women, children, and legal minors who probably had little choice about coming here; 2) Most of them come here to work, send money home and then leave and start projects in their own country---most are illegal because of the ridiculously complicated and convoluted immigration laws; 3) Contrary to what most of them seem to believe, the so-called Blue States also are dealing with immigration issues. It happens to be a national problem; but as we've seen, care for one's neighbor is not an overwhelmingly strong affect among the Right these days.

   A specimen of their state of mind can be seen with this commenter's insights: "The old Mitch McConnell way of dealing with a bully was to sit down with them and negotiate an equitable distribution of our lunch money. The new DeSantis method is to punch them in the nose to let them taste their blood, then offer them nothing. It took a long time, but the Republican party is finally on the right track."

  My idea of being on the right track would be to do what Conservatives traditionally did: provide for the needs of these people---most of whom are obviously desperate---and deport the known criminal and antisocial elements. Notice too how these people never seem to have any issue with certain immigrant groups---mostly Cuban, Jewish, and Indians---minority blocks that tend to vote Republican all seem to get a free pass. 

  While we're on the subject of deportations, it is also quite telling that we never hear any discussion of deporting say, foreign NGOs (like Soros and his groups), or foreign lobbyists, or foreign corporations which are over here instigating trouble. No: that would be Protectionism and violating the Free Market. We have to follow Prager's advice and embrace the "realistic" macro worldview, even if that means not being 'nice.' Such a worldview reflects the spirit of our Postmodern Era; the Spirit of Christ, not so much. 

   This is part and parcel of the problem of Godless Capitalism, of which these immigrant deportations are but one manifestation. The whole problem is being viewed from a cold cost-benefit analysis with no regard to the impact on people effected by it. “It is not the responsibility of Floridians to subsidize aliens to reside in our state unlawfully" said DeSantis, apparently not caring one way or the other whose responsibility it is. These deportations are the extension of it: the might makes right philosophy. As to it's compatibility with Christianity consider the words from the Satanic Bible: "Satan represents kindness to those who deserve it instead of love wasted on ingrates! Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek!" But at least, according to Prager, the Postmodern Right has the luxury of being able to hold Christian views on a Micro Level and Satanic ones on the Macro Level.

   To Society in general, it makes little difference whether the jackboot on its throat is on the Left or Right foot. This is a point that contemporary Conservatives can't seem to grasp: we're not going to defeat the Left by being more ruthless and contemptuous of human rights than they are. A civilization in decline needs to return to its values and not try to compete with the forces destroying it.