MIGHT IS RIGHT AND THE DOUBLE STANDARD

      Let us see if we can figure out what is wrong with this scenario: we have a political party whose top advisor is a transhumanist immigrant from South Africa who is also a key figure in a globalist cabal. The same party's Vice-Presidential nominee was selected by a homosexual immigrant from Germany who is also a member of this global cabal. This same party openly takes money from a foreign government likewise connected to this cabal. 

     Now, this same party advocates a massive expansion of the Police/Surveillance State to combat what it calls an immigrant invasion. They claim that these immigrants are stealing our jobs (never mind that the same billionaires funding them have no issue with exporting American jobs, though). They accuse immigrants of poisoning our blood and subverting our culture (no problem though if they want to host homo weddings and million-dollar fundraisers). They likewise go to great lengths to profile any immigrant-related crime to push their narrative (though politically-correct crimes against immigrants are praised and promoted). They say that we need to keep all foreign workers out to keep up American wages (unless, of course, they want to work for Big Pharma or Big Tech, then they get automatic green-cards). 

       It's obvious to everyone other than True Believers what's wrong with this scenario. In fact, it underscores a problem that has plagued the so-called Conservative Movement for some time and is especially egregious in this year's election. The problem is that this movement is deeply ingrained with a two-tiered paradigm where some are considered more equal than others. In the case of immigrants, so-called Conservatives are perfectly happy to treat one group as subhumans while another group of immigrants can act with complete impunity answering neither to God nor Man. 

    What is the dividing line here? It's the fundamental belief that most of this new breed of Conservative agrees upon: Might Makes Right. This top-tier of foreign power-brokers are acceptable---in spite of the fact that they go against everything that America allegedly stands for---because they have the money (and consequently the authority) to dominate whomsoever they consider the weak. 

   Immigration is the issue where this new trend is most visible; but the same attitude permeates nearly issue that the New Right embraces. The Crony-Capitalism promoted by Neocons over the last 2-3 decades is giving rise to the acceptance of Predatory Capitalism. Neither is anything remotely resembling the Free Market principles on which our economic system has been based for over 200 years. 

   Moral rectitude is not based upon power. Religions themselves teach that Man has free-will and can choose God's Grace and do His Will because they believe that it is Right. The notion of a capricious. authoritarian god who demands obedience just because He can is one typically imposed upon people by religious functionaries in the service of equally capricious and authoritarian governments. That mythos was exploded in the 17th and 18th Centuries, but is making a comeback through the mass-marketing propaganda of Megachurches and Silicon Valley billionaires in sympathy with the Great Reset agenda. 

   As is typical of these kinds of utopian movements, the New Right projects its own vices onto their enemies; hence their continual portrayal of the Democrats as Marxist Communists when in reality Communism advocated the same kind of economic concentration and intolerance of dissent that the New Right does. It's obvious, based upon their blatant double-standards, that their crusade against immigrant invaders is nothing but psychological projection as well. 

    The American Left is blind to this because the Left is obsessed with Identity Politics and mostly driven by self-hating Whites who see racism in everything. of course, this is projection too of their own racism: it never occurs to these people that the woke, inclusive billionaires they support are mostly White predatory Oligarchs who have no problem with imposing eugenic and exploitative economic on developing countries. In fact, that's what has led to the influx of Haitian refugees at the center of the controversy in Ohio. In the last 30 years, the US has sponsored at least three regime-changes in Haiti, flooded the country with corrupt NGOs and predatory Wall Street corporations and even recently imported foreign mercenaries to keep the Haitian populace in check. 

    While there certainly is no shortage of racism among the rank-and-file of the New Right---the whole controversy over the Haitian immigrants in Springfield was instigated by Neo-Nazis after all---racism is not what is driving the anti-immigrant rampage. The Cult of the New Superman genuinely is colorblind: it's based solely on the personal power of anyone who has the ability to exercise it. 

   We mentioned above the subject of free will and as we can see, the New Right represents a perversion of that concept. A will to power is inherent in every man; but in Civilized societies, this is sublimated by the concept that we are all equal in the sight of God and therefore, equal members of a given social order. The New Right predicates the Will to Power and the Will of God as the same things. It reminds one of the statement of serial killer Samuel Little who opined before he died that God gave him the strength to kill, so He must have approved of what Little was doing. Little even justified what he was doing on the grounds that he was only killing sinful women who would have committed more crimes and so he was saving them from themselves. He expressed perfect confidence to an interviewer that he would meet them all soon in Heaven where they would express their gratitude and be part of his harem in the Afterlife. While I don't doubt that Little received an appropriate reward for his actions on this earth, I'm somewhat inclined to believe that the reality didn't meet his expectations.

     Granted, Samuel Little was an inhuman beast, but when we think about it---what are we hearing from the politicians and the pundits on the New Right? We're hearing basically that the vulnerable deserve to die; whether it's innocent women and children being slaughtered in Palestine and East Ukraine; or immigrants turned into the rivers and seas to drown; and the endless talk on social media about the hecatombs of destruction that they hope to wreak on their perceived enemies. 

    American leadership of an earlier era understood that Power was a responsibility: a trust given to them by God and by the People and they would have to account to both in how they employed it. Power for the sake of Power is a form of neurosis and is always based in ethical Egoism (or psychological Narcissism) however much its adherents subordinate themselves to the Will of a leader or a movement. The fact that it happens in a crowd (i.e. the New Right) or an individual (i.e. someone like Samuel Little) the dynamic is the same. It amounts to personal gain at the sacrifice of one's humanity.

    

AFTER THE DEBATE FLOP, FRUSTRATED RINOS DOUBLE-DOWN

       Judging by the infuriated level of pro-Neocon trolls infesting nearly corner of social media this week, the less-than-stellar debate performance of the Republican figurehead must really have stung the True Believers deep. Opinion polls don't seem to have moved much one way or the other, except that the Republicans have lost a few more points here and there. Not even Elon Musk's topping Jeff Bezos in the Plutocracy's space-race generated much enthusiasm for the manly Alpha leaders on the New Right. In fact, two of their top spokesmen managed to alienate even more people including some of their remaining base as well as their new-found allies.

    Social Media influencer Laura Loomer, who has become of the Trump team's star advisers and strategists, started the ball rolling after a post which highlighted the flaws of the Harris Campaign with deeply reasoned and profound discourse of great importance to all of us who care about the serious issues facing America today.

      What really exorcised the True Believers about the reaction to this obviously very well-thought out cautionary dissertation on the grave dangers of a Kamala Harris victory was that a Conservative Congresswoman actually had the gall to question Ms. Laura's moral compass:

     Aghast at this flagrant breach of Party Discipline, Laura reacted with that characteristic tolerance so prevalent among the New Right these days:

       We'll let the readers judge for themselves the moral level of the New Right from that exchange. We will only say for now that Marjorie Taylor Greene is popular in the 'swing state' of Georgia; and after the RINOs already alienated many Georgian Conservatives---first by nominating a complete swine for Senate in 2022 who ended up losing to a weak Democrat---and then more recently throwing the popular Republican Governor Brian Kemp under the bus, the Party Establishment really can't afford too many more mistakes in that State.

     Meanwhile, JD Vance, who already fumbled by promoting an anti-immigrant rumor started by a Neo-Nazi group, showed his great brilliance again today explaining how badly he duped Kennedy supporters with promises of "ending the war in Ukraine in 24 hours." Vance accomplished this stupendous feat by blabbing to a podcaster what that plan actually consisted of.

    "To end the war, you need somebody that first of all people are terrified of," Vance pontificated. “You need to be worried that if Donald Trump – or God forbid, Kamala Harris – says something, that they actually mean it. But you believe it with Donald Trump, you don’t believe that with Kamala Harris. That’s deterrence...I think that’s ultimately what this looks like because “they’re scared of Trump in Russia. They are worried about him in Europe, because he actually means what he says.”

    So what can we conclude from the remarks of Laura Loomer and JD Vance? You're with us, or you're against us; and if you're against us, fear will at least make you comply. Marjorie Taylor Greene is right: this isn't MAGA. It's Bush 3.0. 

    Let's stop deceiving ourselves on this point. These are the kinds of people, governed by these kinds of ideologies, which aspire to assume control of the US Government. We cannot afford to keep looking the other way at this. A decision has to be made: are we going to let this group hijack the Conservative Movement or are we going to stand up and say no? 

HOW A POLITICAL PARTY IMPLODES

     Last night's Big Debate probably is only going to be memorable as an example of how well the RNC Strategy of owning the Libtards by running to the Left of them; controlling the narrative; and dodging issues by appealling to the worst in human nature actually works in reality. Yes, there were some issues discussed: Trump promised to end inflation and stop the war in Ukraine---without explaining how he was going to accomplish any of that. He did also promise not to allow an Abortion Ban to happen: after all, what are Pro-Life voters going to do? Vote for Kamala? 

    There were some highlights from the Big Dance illustrating more the Republican Party's problems than anything else.

     Despite Controlled Opposition posturing as the 'anti-war' party, Kamala stated that she would seek a cease-fire in Gaza, to which Trump replied: "The Democrats hate Israel! The war would never have started if I were President! If she is President, Israel will not exist in two years!"

    Even though the Republicans dropped issues like balancing the federal budget, support for small businesses, and curbing government spending from their Convention Platform, Trump attacked Kamala as a 'Marxist' who didn't have a plan. When asked about his own plan, Trump said that he wouldn't have one until after he was elected.

   As if things couldn't get worse: Trump repeated the fake news about immigrant invaders overrunning Ohio and eating people's dogs, which led to this memorable exchange:

    Kamala: "The Springfield City Manager says there is nobody eating dogs."

    Trump: "They're saying it!"

    Kamala: "Who is saying it."

    Trump: "It's on TV!" 

      The RNC's owner, globalist techno-fascist Elon Musk immediately warned that his lucrative contracts with NASA were in jeopardy if Kamala wins, and chimped out at Taylor Swift to boot. All of this is really going to help.

     I don't know what to say other than I told you so. This is what happens when a Party throws its base under the bus; tries to run a campaign with advertising gurus; and imagines that the Frat Boys and would-be Alphas are secretly admired for their presumed superiority. 

    Conservatives should start reflecting a little more on our own national history and note that the presidents elected by wide margins: Washington, Jackson, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Reagan---didn't win because they drove a Bugatti and everyone thought of them as manly Alpha leaders. They won because they admitted that there were serious national problems that needed to be addressed and had people committed to fixing them on their campaigns. To them, winning wasn't a goal in itself: solving the problems that faced us as a nation was. It wasn't about selling a narrative; it was about getting results. Until we on the Right start facing that fact, we're going to continue to lose and no amount of Madison Avenue spin or Social Media is going to change that. 

   

    

     

THE BIG DANCE

      So today the entire Prozac Nation is waiting in breathless anticipation of tomorrow night's Big Event in Philadelphia where the fate of Our Democracy and Western Civilization hangs in the balance. Hollywood production managers are busily setting the stage; Madison Avenue shylocks are preparing the scripts and the subsequent narratives; the Plutocrats financing both campaigns watching on the Big Screen at their cocktail parties nodding in satisfaction: we're speaking, of course, of the Great Debate of 2024. Orange Man and Cackling Kamala are in their respective corners: so far we haven't heard whether it will be on Pay-Per-View or have live call-in polls or multi-million dollar commercial slots. The debates aren't quite up to the levels of the Super Bowl or the season finale of Love Island, but they're getting there. There's also still no word on who Taylor Swift endorses. 

     It's rather pointless to go into the trash-talk and who owns who going on at all levels of the Media, and that includes the 'journalists,' 'pundits,' and 'analysts' who are doing the same thing but pretending it's high-brow, deep intellectual discourse. This whole fake 'election' has been nothing but one wholly transparent Corporate lobbying campaign with the Oligarchy treating it like a sport. Wall Street and the WEF is going to win either way; this isn't about any ideology, it's about which faction is going to be a better management team and the Elites have condescended to let us Little People make the choice. It's highly reminiscent of the 2012 Campaign between Neoliberal Obama and Neoconservative Romney, with a touch of 2000 Bush vs. Gore urgency and paranoia thrown into the mix.

      In such an atmosphere, it's obvious that reasoned discussion over substantive issues is about the last thing we can expect. The last hoopla in June resulted in Wall Street simply nullifying the entire Democratic Party Primary vote and coronating a new candidate. The Controlled Opposition fumed over that; but then at their own Convention had the Oligarchs choose their Vice-President for them. 

     The Presidential Election itself makes very little difference but it generates a lot of donations and advertising revenue, as well as padding the resumes of ambitious lobbyists and campaign managers. I have predicted---and still stand by this prediction---that all of this is for show and that the Democrats are going to win in a solid wipe-out in November. Here are the reasons:

    1. The Republicans have no issues that distinguish themselves from the Democrats and they've largely alienated their Conservative base. The only support they're going to get are from hard-core Trump fans and people convinced that Kamala is the Antichrist.

   2. The Republicans are being badly beaten in nearly all contested Senate, House, and Gubernatorial races and it's likely that Democrat voters supporting one of these candidates will hold their noses and vote for Kamala.

   3. Most importantly of all, the Oligarchs are financially supporting Kamala at 2-3 times the levels of the Big Cheeses who are donating to Republicans. Some Republicans are going to win offices; but the big donations to the GOP are really just a few billionaires solidifying their based and Red Pilled credentials for future lobbying activities. 

   4. The Oligarchs wouldn't have gone to the trouble of replacing Biden if they thought that the Republicans really were a better deal. 

    In other words, the American Right has been set up to fail again. Watch for the post-debate Official Narrative to be unanimous that Kamala won; her poll numbers to shoot up; the Controlled Opposition to come up with some weak excuses; and the aforementioned Official Narrative gradually slipping into the "national consensus" mode. The whole purpose of having Elections in our Managed Democracy is to create the illusion of the puppet-government having a mandate to do what it pleases. Since our culture values illusions over reality, it's not at all a difficult thing to accomplish. 

    

     

CHINA'S NEW ADOPTION POLICY SHAMES AMERICAN FAKE CONSERVATIVES

      Following the lead of a growing number of countries, the Chinese Foreign Ministry announced today a permanent ban on foreign adoption agencies. The Communist Party of China announced the move after considerable public pressure on their domestic social media sites, highlighting the especially horrible conditions that children are exposed to in the US; including testimonies from a number of expats who'd had personal experience with America's toxic child-rearing environment. The total ban had been proposed for some time: in 2007, China put severe restrictions on adoptive couples, vetting them especially "with an increased scrutiny of families’ lifestyles as well as imposing age limits and restricting adoptions to heterosexual married couples," according to the South China Morning Post. Thus, the previous Chinese law was already better than the standards that most US States have in place. 

    The anti-China hawks in the Corporate Media are foaming with outrage; hypocritically pretending that they really care about families and that the Chinese Government's move is some great act of Commie-Pinko tyranny. What's likely angered the Uniparty a lot more is that they are well on the way to commodifying human trafficking, which promised to be a future growth industry just like the Abortion Racket. The loss of China represents no doubt a major import source of human capital just as the overseas market for aborted fetal tissue and organs brings high prices. 

    If Americans still had any capacity for feeling shame, it would be a national disgrace that the Chinese Communists care more about the welfare of children than we do. It's not at all a positive reflection upon us that the general consensus seems to be that a child growing up in a Chinese orphanage has better future prospects than one growing up in an American home. We might look askance at China's top-down and often heavy-handed approaches to their youth; but there's no use papering-over or excusing the fact that, however awkwardly, they are succeeding in preparing a new generation while our culture is failing. That's the whole point. It's not that Communism is the ideal system: it's that we're not giving anymore any reason for anybody to think otherwise. 

    It didn't used to be this way. Certainly there were abuses and waste in our more libertarian system, but it generally worked. Families were considered the pillar of the community, hence the involvement of local communities in investing in the youth was important. The Dead White Males who were community leaders back then had an entirely different philosophical approach to what we have today. Children were not the 'property' of the State; nor were they the 'property' of the parents: the general consensus was that children were a gift from God and raising and nurturing them was a sacred trust. 

   Somewhere along the line, though, Americans lost that sense of a sacred trust and children became just another commodity on the national balance-sheet. Parenting is calculated on a cost/benefit analysis by most Americans; and as far as the general community is concerned, children only are valuable insofar as they represent a profit to government and corporate bureaucracies---otherwise they are expendable. Only a culture in an advanced state of degeneracy could look at the levels of violence, suicide, addiction, illiteracy, poor mental and physical health of its youth and shrug it off as the new normal.

   The worst thing about it all is that the 'Conservatives' and the 'Christians' in America are the ones doing most of the shrugging. When they aren't, like the self-righteous Pharisee, thanking God that they are not like other men they're cynically looking at these problems as potential opportunities to pad their own pockets while lecturing the human debris left over from their policies to lift themselves up by their bootstraps. 

   The problem isn't with China, it is with us. China is only acting in self-preservation: an instinct which we Americans seem to have lost. If we hope to salvage what we can out of our future, we must recover the social will to do so. Certainly we can't rely on top-down solutions because neither faction of the Uniparty has any particular desire to implement any. Whether or not Americans have enough character left in them to do it though, is another question. 

   

     

LET'S WORRY ABOUT OUR OWN ENDORSEMENTS

        Looking back at the 'election' of 2020, we saw what amounted to a Color Revolution, mounted by the Corporate Elites, which replaced the President. This year, the President installed in 2020 likewise was replaced after a meeting of prominent plutocrats. So essentially, we've had two sitting presidents removed by the will---not of the people---but of financial Oligarchs. 

       Thus, we saw a meeting this week at the Economic Club of New York, at which Trump spoke and drew a standing ovation. The ECNY is headed by a collection of the self-described "brightest minds" focusing on "critical issues and pressing questions."

       Trump praised the support he'd received from his "friends and business leaders" specifically naming five:

       Woody Johnson, of Big Pharma's Johnson & Johnson (a WEF Strategic Partner).

       Jamie Dimon, of High Finance's J.P. Morgan Chase (also a WEF Strategic Partner).

      Steven Schwarzmann of the Blackstone Group (yes, likewise a WEF Straegic Partner).

      Richard Kurtz, head of the rental property conglomerate, Kamson. 

      John Paulson, billionaire hedge fund manager and likely Trump pick for Treasury Secretary.

      Trump promised the Oligarchs that he would make “America the world capital for crypto and BitCoin,” (i.e., Central Bank Digital Currency) and announced that WEF Young Global Leader and government contractor Elon Musk would head  a “government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms.”

     “Kamala Harris is the first major party candidate in American history who fundamentally rejects freedom and embraces Marxism, communism and fascism,” Trump declared, warning that "most pertinent to the very brilliant people in this room, she will raise your business and corporate taxes.”

     While I don't think that anyone will dispute that the Democrats reject freedom and it probably is true that the Robber Barons whom Trump was addressing are 'brilliant' compared to Kamala and her party, it's not especially consoling to imagine the Deep State being managed with Wall Street-level efficiency. If Trump had told this august group that he planned to put the lot of them in jail (where they belong) his poll numbers would skyrocket. So much for draining the swamp: the Republicans of 2024 are evolved and woke. 

    Kamala's two (known) top donors are Reid Hoffman and Michael Bloomberg, who both head WEF-connected corporations. So, evidently, we'll own nothing and be happy no matter what.

     The Controlled Opposition Media meanwile has been chortling over the announcement that Bush Jr.'s former Vice-President Dick Cheney has endorsed Kamala's campaign, doubtless hoping to deflect growing Conservative concerns about the sheer number of Bush-Machine RINOs directing the Trump Campaign. Cheney is probably angry because his daughter was purged from the ranks of True Believers earlier this year; and it's probably occurring to the octogenarian former power-broker that he---like Biden and Trump---is very much expendable in the grand scheme of the New World Order. Oh well: at least he got a federal building in Casper, Wyoming named after him. 

      Chris LaCivita, a former Bush Campaign manager now running the Trump operation, is certainly not above sleazy tactics like that kind of bait-and-switch narrative control. Susie Wiles, a campaign manager for Jeb Bush-owned properties Ron DeSantis and Rick Scott, is a co-chair, and Corey Lewandowski, a former lobbyist for the Neocon Koch Family recently came on board. As influencers Joe Rogan and Kyle Rittenhouse recently discovered: the management team orchestrating the Trump Campaign certainly hasn't lost any of the Bushmen's you're-for-us-or-against-us orientation; a fact underscored today by a missive circulating around the Internet:

       With all of these WEF operatives on board, and given that organization's admitted views on Freedom of Speech, transparency seems to have gone the way of swamp-draining on the New Right too. Given the current Republican Congressional leadership---and their proclivity for pushing things like suppressing protests, expanding domestic espionage, and banning whole media outlets, it's probably a good idea to be a bit skeptical about their commitment to free expression, just like the suspicious Democratic endorsements from the likes of Dick Cheney don't sound especially sincere. 

    We probably stop and reflect instead that in the last four years we've seen Globalist Oligarchs remove two sitting presidents, transfer most of the nation's wealth into their own hands, put the whole nation under Martial Law for two years, and generally act with impunity trampling down our Constitutional Rights. In countries less effete than ours, such things have led to revolutions: but here Americans prefer substituting escapism for action and denialism for critical thinking. So, for now at least, the Elites have little to fear in terms of actual consequences. 

      

    

     

     

     

      

THE GEORGIA SHOOTING: ANOTHER REALITY CHECK

        With the Conservative-Industrial Complex continuing to embrace such winning strategies as subsidizing Big Pharma and the Insurance Cartels for In-Vitro Fertilization, fighting initiatives to free people trapped in the Student Loan Scam, and arguing that Big Ag price-gouging isn't really an issue, Reality has once again made itself felt.

     Today the 14-y/o son of a heroic single mom and her bad-boy ex-lover who was profiled but ignored as a potential problem case, attacked and wounded several people at one of the worst school systems in Georgia. Police immediately were on the scene, setting up press conferences to brag about their response times and grandstand; politicians in both wings of the Uniparty were exploiting the situation for political capital and pointing fingers at each other; school officials and CPS were busily avoiding the media and circling their wagons to evade any responsibility---in other words, just a typical day in our exceptional, postmodern dystopia. In fact, now that they can't blame the shooting on Kamala Harris, the Controlled Opposition has moved on to the exciting news that some members of Tim Walz' family are on social media supporting Trump and what a wonderful opportunity this presents to own those Libtards. 

    I did come across one social media post on the Georgia shooting that restored some optimism that there is still Common Sense in America:

      Such views are of course in the minority, since they don't generate controversy and come too close to the truth. The author is on the right track, though I don't share his faith that CPS would have been any more help to this guy than anybody else was. 

    We have evolved into a culture where every aspect of society is geared to mass-marketing; hence human beings are expendable. Children and legal 'minors' are especially vulnerable because they have no rights and are generally considered a liability rather than an asset in a system where everything is weighed against a Cost/Benefit Analysis. As far as a 'motive' goes; I would surmise that this kid probably had a keen sense of his own expendability and lashed out symbolically by expending others. In fact, most mass-shootings and suicides within this age group likely fit this dynamic, though it is never discussed. It's easier (and more profitable) to blame access to guns or to Tik-Tok.

   We live today in a social atmosphere that is permeated with stress and tension; and as we have pointed out on multiple occasions, this is deliberately being cultivated by the ruling class. The swine in the Corporate Media praise scenes of the most barbaric genocide seen since the 1940s and promote apathy towards graphic violence through the cultural and entertainment media---most of which is met with bored public indifference on the surface. However, that superficial ennui doesn't conceal the human instinct that most feel: that one's own survival is equally precarious. Socially, this fear and insecurity leads to an undue focus on the self, on survival; which in turn is exploited by the same Elites who preach a survival-of-the-fittest doctrine. In other words, it creates, on a social level, a vicious circle where people have dangled before them goals that they can never reach while simultaneously being shamed and treated as inferiors because they can't reach them. Mass-murders, suicides, and addictions are the inevitable result in such a social system.

    Since the end of the Second World War, we've seen a breakdown of family, community, and our institutions. The stability of such institutions are what instills not only the values but the emotional equilibrium of the young in a civilized society. The breakdown of these communities and the collective focus on narcissistic self-fulfillment has had an effect on the generations which grew up within it. An increase in juvenile crime, addiction, mental illness, and homosexuality are the symptoms of a social system nearing its collapse. However, most choose to deny these things and focus on the political and economic opportunism afforded by the New Normal. The public's response: looking the other way, looking out for #1, and---above all---looking for ways to game the system to their own advantage has brought us to this point. 

   We have to start facing the facts that Government by Marketing Experts hasn't worked. It didn't work for the Marxists, but somehow the New Right believes in the infallibility of Monopoly Capitalism, which isn't working either. The problem with both systems is that they are deterministic in their attitudes both about human nature and the direction of history. The True Believers will deny all of that; but in reality the New Right is just as enamored of Scientism and Materialistic Determinism as the New Left is. When Marxism failed, the State resorted to force which was the only appeal it could make, today's political Right does exactly the same thing. 

    Instead of copying the Left and doubling-down, the Right needs to stop and evaluate themselves. Just as in individual psychology the first step to a cure is admitting that one has a problem, the first thing that our side needs to do is to get out of this state of chronic Denialism and scapegoating and start facing the facts. The community that the Georgia shooter lived in was a failed community within a failed State within a failed Nation operating under a failed philosophy. That is how the issues mentioned at the top of the article plays themselves out in Real Life. The attitudes that human life belongs to the Elites; that people who get scammed deserve what they get; and that exploited workers and consumers are just jealous of the people who exploit them naturally generates explosions of frustrated rage turned outward (mass-shootings) or turned inwards (suicides) or both (addiction, sexual perversion). 

   Likewise, the above-mentioned the Strategy of Tension has as its ultimate goal the channelling of all of this projected rage into a strong authoritarian movement and the result of that is the kinds of mass-psychosis that manifested itself with the French Jacobins, the Russian Bolsheviks, the German Nazis, the Cambodian Khmer Rouge, and the contemporary Israeli Zionists. The New World Order that we've been pursuing since 1990 isn't going to end any differently and we need to stop deluding ourselves that it will. 

   

    

    

     

NEOCON TECH LORDS CHIMP OUT OVER BRAZIL BAN

       David O. Sacks, another of the foreign-born Silicon Valley Tech Lords now in charge of the Republican Party, took to the Controlled Opposition Media yesterday to try and sell the narrative that the New Right are the champions of Free Speech and that censorship is an idea that just started under Biden. Sacks' article has come up in a wave of hypocritical outrage following the Brazilian Supreme Court's decision to close Elon Musk's media mouthpiece and freeze his assets in that country. Conservatism, Incorporated---which had no issue doing exactly the same thing to Tik-Tok just a year ago---is foaming over Brazil's actions; even though the Brazilian case had a lot more plausible argument for foreign interference than the Tik-Tok seizure had; and largely, Musk's big ego and even bigger mouth caused the predicament he's found himself in. 

      In 2016, Obama and his henchmen staged a Color Revolution in Brazil as part of the Deep State's general asymmetrical warfare against BRICS countries. Their paid stooge was voted out of office later on, and Brazil has since stabilized. Musk was not-so-covertly promoting the ousted president on X; Brazil's legal authorities sought to prohibit this; Musk refused and now he's foaming that he, a billionaire, should be rebuffed by a foreign government. In most of the exceptional Western democracies, governments obey Plutocrats, not the other way around. 

    There certainly is room for debate over whether or not Brazil's actions were the best course; but President Lula's hiding behind the Supreme Court and claiming that his hands are legally tied is hardly a tactic that American Conservatives can condemn without looking like complete hypocrites. The near 50-year history of Roe vs. Wade and the GOP's mendacious behavior during the 2020 Election Steal are proof of that. 

    Brazilian politics aside, Sacks' own hypocrisy is displayed in his article. He starts out for example, by throwing out the pathetic Gonzalo Lira as a hero of freedom of speech; like Musk, Lira was a victim of his own stupidity moreso than any martyr for a principle, but the New Right has made him the George Floyd of their movement. Sacks complains that "Lira died in a Ukrainian prison for posting YouTube videos; and the State Department didn’t lift a finger to help," without mentioning that Lira was a citizen of Chile and that the Chilean Foreign Ministry was dealing with his case. He further asserts that "barring court intervention, TikTok will shut down in the U.S. on January 19, 2025 thanks to a new power authorized by Congress to ban websites and applications that the president determines are subject to the influence of a foreign adversary. X may not be far behind if liberal elites and deep state apparatchiks like Robert Reich and Alexander Vindman get their wish," without mentioning that this 'power' was introduced by the Republican-controlled Congress.  

        The rest of the article continues much in the same vein; Sacks and Musk though are really a pair of cyber-bullies who got a taste of their own medicine. The worrisome thing is both of these jokers are likely to get into actual positions of power if the Red Wave somehow materializes. Musk is already presuming to have the authority of the State Department (which he likely has regardless of which Party 'wins' in November). Sacks opines:

      "As this battle over free speech heats up in an election year, where do the candidates stand? Donald Trump has declared his support for free speech whereas Kamala Harris has said nothing and can be expected to continue her administration’s policy of tacit approval of creeping censorship." 

      To which we might adduce the following specimen of the Trump Campaign's commitment to Free Speech:

      “One thing I do is, any student that protests, I throw them out of the country... As soon as they hear that, they’re going to behave.”

      Specimen of Conservative Tech Lords' support for Free Speech:

     "I’m just one firm doing this. When we dig deep into the dark web for your background, I’ll see you. We don’t even consider that person...If your passion for a cause is more important than your future career, go for it. I’m not saying you shouldn’t do that. I think you should think about your future. Think about your career. Think about your personal brand. Think about all the opportunities you’ll never know that you missed. You’ll never know why you didn’t get that loan, or that mortgage, or that job, or get that board seat.” 

     Of course, the Biden/Harris/Walz Junta is no friend of the First Amendment either, but I think that it would behoove Conservatives to consider very carefully what their proposed replacements intend to do.